Patrick Jones v. Warden Lewisburg USP
| PATRICK JONES |
| WARDEN LEWISBURG USP |
| 15-1707 |
| March 24, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Patrick Jones v. Warden Lewisburg USP |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012122312
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: FUENTES, KRAUSE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 4. BLD-032. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel in this Court is Denied.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Patrick Jones v. Warden Lewisburg USP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: PATRICK JONES | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP | |
| Represented By: | Kate L. Mershimer |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Morrison |
| Represented By: | G. Michael Thiel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
