Armagene Ellis-Smith v. Michael Astrue

Plaintiff - Appellant: ARMAGENE ELLIS-SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Party-in-Interest: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 10-2281
Filed: November 17, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 15, 2011 Armagene Ellis-Smith v. Michael Astrue

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 15, 2011 403431016 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-00604-TDS-WWD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998632644]. Mailed to: Armagene Ellis-Smith. [10-2281]
Search for this case: Armagene Ellis-Smith v. Michael Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ARMAGENE ELLIS-SMITH
Represented By: Armagene Ellis-Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Gill Paul Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Party-in-interest: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.