Theodore Justice v. Robert Hobgood, Jr.

Plaintiff - Appellant: THEODORE JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT H. HOBGOOD, JR., Senior Resident Superior Court Judge in the Ninth Judicial District, in his individual and official capacity
Case Number: 14-1539
Filed: June 6, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
November 20, 2014 Theodore Justice v. Robert Hobgood, Jr.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 20, 2014 405236216 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999404035-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00677-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999478885]. [14-1539]
Search for this case: Theodore Justice v. Robert Hobgood, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: THEODORE JUSTICE
Represented By: Theodore Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ROBERT H. HOBGOOD, JR., Senior Resident Superior Court Judge in the Ninth Judicial District, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.