Beattie Ashmore v. Feleicia Cook
BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE, in his Capacity as Court Appointed Receiver for The Three Hebrew Boys |
FELEICIA COOK |
14-1665 |
July 8, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405231827 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999406839-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-01449-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999476885]. Mailed to: appellant and Lauren Price. [14-1665] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Beattie Ashmore v. Feleicia Cook | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE, in his Capacity as Court Appointed Receiver for The Three Hebrew Boys | |
Represented By: | Lauren Price |
Represented By: | Lewis Walter Tollison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: FELEICIA COOK | |
Represented By: | Feleicia Cook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.