US v. Mike Merzoug
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Petitioner: MIKE AZIZ MERZOUG
Case Number: 14-7278
Filed: August 29, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 2, 2015 US v. Mike Merzoug

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405527120 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cr-00131-HMH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999613771].. [14-7278]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Mike Merzoug
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David Calhoun Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - petitioner: MIKE AZIZ MERZOUG
Represented By: Jonathan Aaron Bartell
Represented By: Stanley Turner Case
Represented By: Jack Bruce Swerling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?