US v. Warren Newell
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WARREN ROSSLYN NEWELL
Case Number: 14-7461
Filed: October 2, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 21, 2015 US v. Warren Newell

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405311698 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00022-MR-DLH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999513950]. Mailed to: Warren Newell and attorney Richard Cassady. [14-7461]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Warren Newell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Thomas Richard Ascik
Represented By: Richard Lee Edwards
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: WARREN ROSSLYN NEWELL
Represented By: Richard E. Cassady
Represented By: Warren Rosslyn Newell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?