US v. Benjamin Calderon
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BENJAMIN JULIO AYUSO CALDERON, a/k/a Raul Rafael Vargas-Nolasco
Case Number: 15-4242
Filed: April 24, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 5, 2016 US v. Benjamin Calderon

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 405817052 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00155-NCT-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999749862]. [15-4242]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Benjamin Calderon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Terry Michael Meinecke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: BENJAMIN JULIO AYUSO CALDERON, a/k/a Raul Rafael Vargas-Nolasco
Represented By: Renorda Eulissa Pryor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?