Everette Johnson v. Harold Clarke
Petitioner - Appellant: EVERETTE LEWIS JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director, DOC
Case Number: 15-6068
Filed: January 14, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 26, 2015 Everette Johnson v. Harold Clarke

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405474787 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00026-RBS-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999589694]. Mailed to: E. Johnson. [15-6068]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Everette Johnson v. Harold Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: EVERETTE LEWIS JOHNSON
Represented By: Everette Lewis Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director, DOC
Represented By: Rosemary Virginia Bourne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?