US v. Shawn Sadler
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SHAWN SADLER, a/k/a Tangulifu M. Barber, a/k/a Carlos Watts
Case Number: 15-6294
Filed: March 2, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 27, 2015 US v. Shawn Sadler

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405557664 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00330-CMC-5. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627845]. Mailed to: Shawn Sadler. [15-6294]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Shawn Sadler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Nancy Chastain Wicker
Represented By: William Kenneth Witherspoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SHAWN SADLER, a/k/a Tangulifu M. Barber, a/k/a Carlos Watts
Represented By: Shawn Sadler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?