USA v. Isaias Torres-Salcedo

Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ISAIAS TORRES-SALCEDO, also known as Isaias Torres, also known as Michael Alfonso Loya, also known as Isaias Torres Salcedo
Case Number: 13-20465
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 29, 2014 USA v. Isaias Torres-Salcedo

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 29, 2014 502751671 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20465 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EBC , Judge: ECP , Judge: JWE Mandate pull date is 09/19/2014 for Appellant Isaias Torres-Salcedo; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Lance C. Hamm [7555784-2] [13-20465]
Search for this case: USA v. Isaias Torres-Salcedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Renata Ann Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: ISAIAS TORRES-SALCEDO, also known as Isaias Torres, also known as Michael Alfonso Loya, also known as Isaias Torres Salcedo
Represented By: Rogelio J. Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.