Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. CIR
| PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to Pilgrim's Pride Corporation of Georgia, formly known as Gold Kist, Incorporated; Successor in Interest to Gold Kist, Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
| COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
| 14-60295 |
| April 23, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. CIR
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. CIR | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to Pilgrim's Pride Corporation of Georgia, formly known as Gold Kist, Incorporated; Successor in Interest to Gold Kist, Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |
| Represented By: | Robert H. Albaral |
| Represented By: | Todd A. Schroeder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Keneally |
| Represented By: | William J. Wilkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
