Adam Ward v. William Stephens, Director
ADAM KELLY WARD |
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
14-70015 |
April 7, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 502912236 PUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED. [14-70015 Affirmed ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: EBC , Judge: ECP; denying motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Adam Kelly Ward [7648708-2]; denying motion for oral argument filed by Appellant Mr. Adam Kelly Ward (ISSUED AS AND FOR THE MANDATE) [7648708-3] [14-70015] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Adam Ward v. William Stephens, Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: ADAM KELLY WARD | |
Represented By: | David R. Dow |
Represented By: | Phillip Carl Umphres |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Represented By: | Jefferson David Clendenin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.