Lortz, Limited v. Curtis Gilbert

Plaintiff - Appellant: LORTZ, LIMITED, d/b/a Midwest Ordnance
Defendant - Appellee: CURTIS W. GILBERT, Director of Industry Operations, Detroit Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
Case Number: 10-1745
Filed: June 8, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
December 8, 2011 Lortz, Limited v. Curtis Gilbert

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 8, 2011 6111150970 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION filed: AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Ralph B. Guy , Jr., Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, (authoring) Circuit Judge and Helene N. White, Circuit Judge.
Search for this case: Lortz, Limited v. Curtis Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: LORTZ, LIMITED, d/b/a Midwest Ordnance
Represented By: Joel J. Kirkpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CURTIS W. GILBERT, Director of Industry Operations, Detroit Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
Represented By: Derri T. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.