Shashikant Patel v. United States Citizenship and
SHASHIKANT PATEL |
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE |
12-1962 |
July 31, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Deportation |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Patel v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigrations Servs. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111846910 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey (DISSENTING), Jeffrey S. Sutton, and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Shashikant Patel v. United States Citizenship and | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: SHASHIKANT PATEL | |
Represented By: | Michael E. Piston |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE | |
Represented By: | Agnes Kempker-Cloyd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.