Jeffrey Zibbell, et al v. Michigan Department of Human S, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY ZIBBELL and CHERYL ZIBBELL
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
Case Number: 12-2069
Filed: August 21, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute

Search for this case: Jeffrey Zibbell, et al v. Michigan Department of Human S, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JEFFREY ZIBBELL
Represented By: Jeffrey Zibbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CHERYL ZIBBELL
Represented By: Cheryl Zibbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Represented By: William R. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
Represented By: William R. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.