William Beaumont Hospital v. Federal Insurance Company

Defendant - Appellant: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff - Appellee: WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL
Case Number: 13-1468
Filed: April 16, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
January 16, 2014 William Beaumont Hospital v. Federal Insurance Company

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 16, 2014 6111938722 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Deborah L. Cook and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges; James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Search for this case: William Beaumont Hospital v. Federal Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Steven M. Hickey
Represented By: Daniel J. Layden
Represented By: Ronald P. Schiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL
Represented By: Keefe A. Brooks
Represented By: Michael R. Turco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.