Robert Lindner v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan

Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT LINDNER, Special Administrator of the Estates of BURTON R. LINDNER and ZORINE LINDNER, deceased
Defendant - Appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Case Number: 13-1422
Filed: February 27, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 11, 2014 Summary Lindner v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 11, 2014 702289887 Opinion or Order of the Court Filed opinion of the court by Judge Sykes. DISMISSED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6596837-1] [6596837] [13-1422]
Search for this case: Robert Lindner v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: ROBERT LINDNER, Special Administrator of the Estates of BURTON R. LINDNER and ZORINE LINDNER, deceased
Represented By: Robert A. Clifford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Represented By: Thomas A. Andreoli
Represented By: Thomas E. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.