David VanderLeest v. City of Green Bay
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID VANDERLEEST
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF GREEN BAY
Case Number: 14-1254
Filed: February 6, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 9, 2014 David VanderLeest v. City of Green Bay

RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 702248474 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge; John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6581481-1] [6581481] [14-1254]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David VanderLeest v. City of Green Bay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID VANDERLEEST
Represented By: David VanderLeest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CITY OF GREEN BAY
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?