State of Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF WISCONSIN
Defendant - Appellant: HO-CHUNK NATION
Case Number: 14-2529
Filed: July 11, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 29, 2015 Summary Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 702518715 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Wood. The district court's judgment is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6659117-1] [6659117] [14-2529]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: State of Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: STATE OF WISCONSIN
Represented By: Christopher J. Blythe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: HO-CHUNK NATION
Represented By: Thomas M. Pyper
Represented By: Michael P. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?