Alliance for Water Efficiency v. James Fryer
| ALLIANCE FOR WATER EFFICIENCY |
| JAMES FRYER |
| 15-1206 |
| February 3, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Copyright |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Alliance for Water Efficiency v. Fryer
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702671123
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. REVERSED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6716501-1] [6716501] [15-1206]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Alliance for Water Efficiency v. James Fryer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: ALLIANCE FOR WATER EFFICIENCY | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Walsh Tarpey |
| Represented By: | David G. Wix |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: JAMES FRYER | |
| Represented By: | Christopher W. Katzenbach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
