Ronald Carpenter, Jr. v. Michael Dittmann
Petitioner - Appellant: RONALD M. CARPENTER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL A. DITTMANN
Case Number: 15-1688
Filed: March 31, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 28, 2016 Summary Carpenter v. Douma

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 702871624 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. AFFIRMED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6793645-1] [6793645] [15-1688]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronald Carpenter, Jr. v. Michael Dittmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: RONALD M. CARPENTER, JR.
Represented By: Ronald M. Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MICHAEL A. DITTMANN
Represented By: Sandra Lynn Tarver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?