Saint Mary's Hospital v. Michael Leavitt
Plaintiff - Appellant: Saint Mary's Hospital of Rochester, Minnesota
Defendant - Appellee: Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Case Number: 07-2546
Filed: June 29, 2007
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Recovery Overpayments-Medicare Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 28, 2008 Saint Mary's Hospital v. Michael Leavitt

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920080728 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Saint Mary's Hospital v. Michael Leavitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Saint Mary's Hospital of Rochester, Minnesota
Represented By: Dulce Jo Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Represented By: Jennifer Rae Frier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?