Art Etc. LLC v. Angel Gifts, Inc., et al

Plaintiff - Appellee: Art Etc. LLC
Defendant - Appellant: Angel Gifts, Inc. and Donald Schmit
Case Number: 11-2083
Filed: May 17, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 27, 2012 Summary Art Etc. LLC v. Angel Gifts, Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 27, 2012 811969520 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION FILED - THE COURT: DIANA E. MURPHY, KERMIT E. BYE and STEVEN M. COLLOTON. Steven M. Colloton, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3936364] [11-2083]
Search for this case: Art Etc. LLC v. Angel Gifts, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: Art Etc. LLC
Represented By: Bradley J. Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Angel Gifts, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Howard Makeig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Donald Schmit
Represented By: Thomas Howard Makeig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.