Arthur Taylor, Jr. v. Dave Dormire, et al
| Arthur E. Taylor, Jr. |
| Dave Dormire, in his individual and official capacity and Chad Hovis, 2nd Shift Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity. |
| 13-2626 |
| July 25, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Arthur Taylor, Jr. v. Dave Dormire, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: Arthur E. Taylor, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Arthur E. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Dave Dormire, in his individual and official capacity | |
| Represented By: | P. Benjamin Cox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Chad Hovis, 2nd Shift Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity. | |
| Represented By: | P. Benjamin Cox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
