Gary Black, et al v. Google, Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff - Appellant,: GARY BLACK, DBA Cal Bay Construction and HOLLI BEAM-BLACK, DBA Castle Roofing
Defendant - Appellee,: GOOGLE, INC.
Case Number: 10-16992
Filed: September 10, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2011 Filing 23 Filed Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black objection. Served on 07/27/2011. [7836397] (MT)
May 10, 2011 Filing 22 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black (Informal: Yes) reply brief of 19 pages. Served on 05/10/2011. [7752222] (GLS)
May 10, 2011 Filing 21 Received 9 copies of opening brief by Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black. (RECORDS) (GLS)
May 6, 2011 Filing 20 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [17] filed by Google, Inc.. [7744365] (SD)
May 6, 2011 Filing 19 Filed Appellee Google, Inc. excerpts of record in 1 volume. Served on 05/04/2011. [7742926] (GLS)
May 5, 2011 Filing 18 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [17] submitted by Google, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a red cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7741289] (GLS)
May 4, 2011 Filing 17 Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Google, Inc.. Date of service: 05/04/2011. [7740623] (DHK)
March 25, 2011 Filing 16 14 day oral extension of time granted to appellee Google, Inc. The answering brief is due 5/4/2011. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7695316] (LB)
March 21, 2011 Filing 15 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 44 pages. Served on 12/20/2010. [7690426] (GLS)
March 21, 2011 Filing 14 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) Appellants’ opposed motion for leave to file an oversized opening brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the oversized opening brief received on December 20, 2010. The answering brief is due 30 days after the date of this order. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. Appellants’ motion for leave to file a corrected opening brief is denied. The Clerk shall discard the opening briefs received on January 3, 2011 and January 10, 2011. (Pro Mo) [7687989] (MS)
January 14, 2011 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Google, Inc. response to motion (,to file oversized brief,to file substitute or corrected brief). Date of service: 01/14/2011. [7613356] (BEV)
January 10, 2011 Filing 12 Received original and 7 copies of Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black opening brief (Informal: Yes) 34 pages. Served on 01/10/2011. Major deficiencies: motion to substitute/correct brief pending. [7610087] (GLS)
January 10, 2011 Filing 11 Filed Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black motion to submit an oversized brief, substituted or corrected brief. Served on 01/10/2011. [7610042] (GLS)
January 3, 2011 Filing 10 Received original and 7 copies of Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black opening brief (Informal: Yes) 44 pages. Served on 01/03/2011. Major deficiencies: Oversized. Motion required to submit an amended opening brief. Notified appellant. (SHELF) [7601016] (GLS)
December 20, 2010 Filing 9 Received original and 7 copies of Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black opening brief (Informal: Yes) 44 pages. Served on 12/20/2010. Major deficiencies: oversized. Notified appellant. [7590258] (GLS)
December 9, 2010 Filing 8 Filed order (ALFRED T. GOODWIN and PAMELA ANN RYMER) Appellants’ motion to stay the August 13, 2010 and September 20, 2010 district court orders is denied. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [7574668] (KKW)
October 22, 2010 Filing 7 Filed order () On September 17, 2010, this court issued an order staying the proceedings pending disposition of the motions for reconsideration in the district court. On September 20, 2010, the district court denied the pending motions for reconsideration. The stay order filed on September 17, 2010, is lifted and this appeal shall proceed. The briefing schedue established on September 10, 2010 shall continue to govern this appeal. [7519555] (CO)
October 8, 2010 Filing 6 Received Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black notice regarding notice of challenge to federal statute. [7503196] (MT)
September 23, 2010 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Google, Inc. response to motion (,to stay lower court action). Date of service: 09/23/2010. [7484860] (BEV)
September 17, 2010 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:CO): Motion to stay proceedings pending resolution of the August 25, 2010 and August 30, 2010 pending motions [7478301] (CO)
September 13, 2010 Filing 3 Filed Appellants Holli Beam-Black and Gary Black motion to stay: the court's order granting defendant's motion to dismiss and denying as moot plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Served on 08/13/2010. [7475763] (MT)
September 13, 2010 Filing 2 Filed Mediation Questionnaire. . [7473947] (MT)
September 10, 2010 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Holli Beam-Black and Appellant Gary Black opening brief due 12/20/2010. Appellee Google, Inc. answering brief due 01/18/2011. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7470367] (RT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gary Black, et al v. Google, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: GARY BLACK, DBA Cal Bay Construction
Represented By: Gary Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: HOLLI BEAM-BLACK, DBA Castle Roofing
Represented By: Holli Beam-Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: GOOGLE, INC.
Represented By: David H. Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?