Pete Guinan v. UPS, et al
| PETE S. GUINAN |
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and PACKAGE AND UTILITY DRIVERS LOCAL 396, Affiliated with the International Brotherwood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America |
| 12-55970 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Labor/Management Relations Act |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pete Guinan v. UPS, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: PETE S. GUINAN | |
| Represented By: | William David Evans |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. | |
| Represented By: | George W. Abele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: PACKAGE AND UTILITY DRIVERS LOCAL 396, Affiliated with the International Brotherwood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Rosenfeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
