New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of Phoenix, et al
| NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC |
| CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona a division of Arizona, State of and PHOENIX BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, a division of Phoenix Planning and Development Services |
| 13-16892 |
| September 19, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Torts to Land |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of Phoenix, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joel E. Sannes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona a division of Arizona, State of | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: PHOENIX BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, a division of Phoenix Planning and Development Services | |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Hyde |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
