Vandana Upadhyay v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff - Appellant,: VANDANA UPADHYAY
Defendant - Appellee,: AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporaiton, in its capacities as a fiduciary and an administrator of the Symmetricom, Inc. Long Term Disability Benefits Plan, an ERISA-regulated employee welfare benefit plan
Case Number: 14-15420
Filed: March 6, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 23, 2016 VANDANA UPADHYAY V. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vandana Upadhyay v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: VANDANA UPADHYAY
Represented By: Joseph Creitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporaiton, in its capacities as a fiduciary and an administrator of the Symmetricom, Inc. Long Term Disability Benefits Plan, an ERISA-regulated employee welfare benefit plan
Represented By: Jordan Shae Altura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?