Peter Kuretski, et al v. Commissioner of IRS

Petitioner - Appellant: Peter Kuretski and Kathleen Kuretski
Respondent - Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 13-1090
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
June 20, 2014 Summary Kuretski, et al. v. Commissioner of IRS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 20, 2014 1207603868 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION filed [1498618] (Pages: 28) for the Court by Judge Srinivasan [13-1090]
Search for this case: Peter Kuretski, et al v. Commissioner of IRS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: Peter Kuretski
Represented By: Carlton Malben Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: Kathleen Kuretski
Represented By: Carlton Malben Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.