Kaplan v. Archer et al
Marc Harris Kaplan |
William Trujillo, John W. Suthers, Kirk Stewart Samelson, Harold Butts, Terry Maketa, John W. Hickenlooper, Dan May, Michelle L. Archer and Karla Jean Hansen |
1:2011cv02094 |
August 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
El Paso |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER. The 41 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted. Defendants' 23 , 25 motions to dismiss are granted and this case is dismissed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/9/12.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER. The Clerk of the Court shall docket the "Notice of Understanding and Intent with Claim of Right From the Office of the Director of the Trust" and the "Notice of Default, Dishonor, and Opportunity to Cure" in this action. To the extent these notices seek Court action, they are denied without prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/23/12. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ENTRY for Preliminary Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/21/2011.Denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement; Denying 8 Motion for More Definite Statement. ORDERED: Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before November 10, 2011. (FTR: Laura Galera) (lag) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.