Muse v. RETS Tech Center, Inc.
| Kevin Muse |
| RETS Tech Center, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv03182 |
| December 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/30/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Settlement Conference set for 6/12/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/2/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 7/7/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/21/2014. (jsmit )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Setting Final Pretrial Conference for 3/21/2014 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, proposed Final Pretrial Order, original only, shall be delivered in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 13, 2014, and lead counsel present in person, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/5/2014. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT DISMISSING FIRST AND SECOND CLAIMS FOR RELIEF re 20 : judgment will enter dismissing the first and second claims for relief, alleging breach of contract and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, respectively, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/8/2014. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
19
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER re 18 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/2/2013. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 8/21/2013 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4:00 p.m. 8/15/2013, and lead counsel present in person, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/11/2013. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Request Call Records and Text Messages from AT&T, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/18/2013.(rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/18/2013 at 11:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on January 10, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/7/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by NONE on October 9, 2012. (johar, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Muse v. RETS Tech Center, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RETS Tech Center, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter F. Munger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Muse | |
| Represented By: | Erin Casey Hogan |
| Represented By: | Leah P. VanLandschoot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
