Abraham et al v. Hertz Corporation et al
||Hertz Corporation, Simply Wheelz LLC, Stryden Corporation and Accord Human Capital, Inc.
||Tesfaye Workneh, Kidane Angelo, Solomon Abraham, Addis H. Tessema, Muluneh M. Tizazu, Enrique Sanabria and Birhanu Dinku
||December 24, 2012
||Colorado District Court
||Michael E. Hegarty
||William J. Martinez
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000a Title II Civil Rights Act 1964
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 28, 2013
ORDER The Magistrate Judges Recommendation (ECF No. 28) is ADOPTED in its entirety; Plaintiffs Complaint ECF No. 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts orders; The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the above-captioned matter and enter judgment in accordance with this Order, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/28/2013.(ervsl, )
|August 29, 2013
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 32 Order on Report and Recommendations, in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs Complaint ECF No. 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/29/2013. (ervsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.