Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 21, 24, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 47, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 and 63
| Purzel Video GmbH |
| Does 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 21, 24, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 47, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 and 63 |
| 1:2013cv01166 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH, shall amend the case caption on future filings to reflect the dismissal of Doe Nos. 11, 33, and 35 by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/17/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER. ORDERED that Doe Nos. 24 and 41 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action. ORDERED that Doe No. 12 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. ORDERED that plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH, shall amend the case caption to reflect the dismissal of Doe Nos. 12, 24, and 41 in future filings in this action by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/16/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/06/13.(jjhsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 21, 24, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 47, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 and 63 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Purzel Video GmbH | |
| Represented By: | Paul Alan Lesko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 21, 24, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 47, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 and 63 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
