Smartmatic USA Corporation et al v. Dominion Voting Systems Corporation et al
| Smartmatic USA Corporation, Smartmatic International Corporation and Smartmatic Services Corporation |
| Dominion Voting Systems Corporation and Dominion Voting Systems Inc |
| 1:2013cv02949 |
| October 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER Granting #26 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. This action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 05/18/2017. (athom, )
|
| Filing 26 Joint MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice by Defendants Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Johnson, Eric) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER of Administrative Closure. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/14/2016. (agarc, )
|
| Filing 24 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #23 Notice Of Withdrawal of Jeremy S. Winer. The document was scanned not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take-future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil Cases). (Text Only Entry). (cmira) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Jeremy S. Winer by Defendants Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems Inc (Winer, Jeremy) (Modified on 4/5/2016 Counsel has been called and asked to re-file as a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney)(evana, ). |
|
Filing 22
ORDER denying without prejudice #19 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/25/2015. (alowe)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Joint Status Report filed by the parties (docket #20 ), the Status Conference set for Tuesday, 2/3/2015 is vacated. Counsel for the parties shall file a Joint Status Report in this case on or before 4/1/2015 or when the stay is lifted, whichever occurs first. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/2/2015. (alowe)
|
| Filing 20 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiffs Smartmatic USA Corporation, Smartmatic International Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation Defendants Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems Inc. (Wilson, David) Modified filers on 2/2/2015 (alowe). |
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/30/2015. Status Conference set for 2/3/2015 10:15 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Richard A. Johnston by Defendants Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Bruce Davidson Oakley on behalf of Smartmatic International Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic USA Corporation (Oakley, Bruce) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Plaintiffs Smartmatic International Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic USA Corporation (Oakley, Bruce) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David A. DeMarco on behalf of Smartmatic International Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic USA Corporation (DeMarco, David) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Khang Vinh Tran on behalf of Smartmatic International Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic USA Corporation (Tran, Khang) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ira S. Greene on behalf of Smartmatic International Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic USA Corporation (Greene, Ira) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David Bruce Wilson on behalf of Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (Wilson, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Eric E. Johnson on behalf of Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CM/ECF PROCEDURES: Richard Alan Johnston has failed to register for electronic case filing in violation of local rules and procedures of the court. Counsel must create an Attorney Services Portal Account to register for CM/ECF, and once registered pay the mandatory 2013 one-time renewal fee of $50. Text Only Entry (mjfsl) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON ADMITTED ATTORNEYS. The court construes that David R. Michaeli, Ira S. Greene, Marc J. Gottridge, George W. Shuster, Jr., and Jeremy S. Winer have entered appearances as attorneys in this case based on appearing as attorneys of record in a case transferred from another court. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 11.1A, an attorney must be a member of the court's bar to make an appearance in a case before the court. The attorney records of the court do not reflect that counsel are members of the bar. Unless an application for admission to the bar of the court or a motion to withdraw in this case is received within 20 days of the date of this entry, action may be taken by the court. Text Only Entry (mjfsl) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for non-dispositive motions. That pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), enter a Scheduling Order that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders as appropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, further that the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of Judge Blackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred, subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referred as defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/31/13. Text Only Entry (rebsec, )
|
| Filing 6 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #5 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 13-cv-2949-REB-MEH. Text Only Entry (jjhsl, ) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Daniel. (jjhsl, ) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by Defendants Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, and Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk to counsel advising case number has been transferred to this District and of assignment of a civil case number (dbera, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., filed by Smartmatic USA Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic International Corporation.(dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge Micheal E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 Case transferred in from Southern District of New York; Case Number 13-cv-05349. File, transfer order and docket sheet received, filed by Smartmatic USA Corporation, Smartmatic Services Corporation, Smartmatic International Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Document 1, #2 Dcoument 2, #3 Document 3, #4 Document 4, #5 Document 5, #6 Document 5-1, #7 Document 5-2, #8 Document 5-3, #9 Document 5-4, #10 Document 5-5, #11 Document 5-6, #12 Document 5-7, #13 Document 5-8, #14 Document 5-9, #15 Document 5-10, #16 Document 5-11, #17 Document 5-12, #18 Document 5-13, #19 Document 5-14, #20 Document 5-15, #21 Document 6, #22 Document 7, #23 Document 8, #24 Document 9, #25 Document 10, #26 Document 11, #27 Document 11-1, #28 Document 12, #29 Document 12-1, #30 Document 12-2, #31 Document 12-3, #32 Document 12-4, #33 Document 12-5, #34 Document 12-6, #35 Document 12-7, #36 Document 12-8, #37 Document 12-9, #38 Document 12-10, #39 Document 12-11, #40 Document 12-12, #41 Document 13, #42 Document 14, #43 Document 15, #44 Document 16, #45 Document 16-1, #46 Document 16-2, #47 Document 17, #48 Document 18, #49 Document 19, #50 Document 20, #51 Document 21, #52 Document 22, #53 Document 23, #54 Document 24, #55 Document 25, #56 Document 26, #57 Document 27, #58 Document 27-1, #59 Document 27-2, #60 Document 27-3, #61 Document 27-4, #62 Document 27-5, #63 Document 27-6, #64 Document 28, #65 Document 28-1, #66 Document 28-2, #67 Document 28-3, #68 Document 28-4, #69 Document 28-5, #70 Document 28-6, #71 Document 29, #72 Document 30, #73 Document 31, #74 Document 31-1, #75 Document 31-2, #76 Document 31-3, #77 Document 31-4, #78 Document 31-5, #79 Document 31-6, #80 Document 31-7, #81 Document 31-8, #82 Document 31-9, #83 Document 32, #84 Document 33, #85 Document 33-1, #86 Document 33-2, #87 Document 33-3, #88 Document 33-4, #89 Document 33-5, #90 Document 33-6, #91 Document 33-7, #92 Document 33-8, #93 Document 34, #94 Document 35, #95 Document 36, #96 Document 36-1, #97 Document 36-2, #98 Docket Sheet)(dbera, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
