Countryman Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
| Countryman Nevada, LLC |
| John Doe 10, John Doe 9, John Doe 8, John Doe 7, John Doe 6, John Doe 5, John Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and John Doe 11 |
| 1:2014cv01092 |
| April 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER DISMISSING CASE In accordance with the Notice of Dismissal of Case Without Prejudice filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on August 16, 2014 ECF No. 29 , it is ORDERED that the remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/18/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re: 25 Notice of Dismissal of Party filed by Countryman Nevada, LLC., Defendant John Doe # 6 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/3/2014. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot and without prejudice 19 Defendant Doe #5's "Notice of Motion and Motion for Order Vacating and Setting Aside Default (and Default Judgment)," by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/29/2014. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
15
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 13 Motion to Quash, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/27/2014.(evana, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
