Marks v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
| Nancy Marks |
| Colorado Department of Corrections, Jefferson County Corrections Board, Intervention Community Corrections Services, Susan Keller, Kristin Heath, Rick Raemisch, Susan (I) Keller, Kristin (I) Heath and Rick (I) Raemisch |
| 1:2014cv01577 |
| June 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER re: 78 Procedural Order Number One, it is ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on June 16, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on June 6, 2016, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/25/2016. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
78
PROCEDURAL ORDER NUMBER ONE Counsel will meet and confer as required by Rule 26(f)(2) within 30 days from the date of this order. Lead counsel shall attend the conference in person. The disclosures required by Rule 26(a) (1)(A) shall be made wi thin 14 days after that conference. The proposed discovery plan will be in the form of the Scheduling Order which will be submitted to chambers in paper form 10 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference. Counsel for the plaintiff(s) will telephone chambers within 10 days after the disclosures to set a date and time for a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 16. The instructions for preparation of the Scheduling Order and the form of that order are found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/11/16. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT At the hearing held on July 24, 2015 71 , the Court ordered Plaintiff to amend the complaint. Nothing further has been filed. Counsel shall file a status report on or before March 2, 2016, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/24/16. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
69
MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to the Order for Status Conference 67 , a status conference is set for July 24, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/25/15. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER FOR STATUS CONFERENCE A status conference will be convened at a time to be scheduled with counsel, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/19/15. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER re: 56 3/12/15 Order, the proceeding will be a scheduling conference Scheduling Conference set for 4/20/2015 02:00 PM in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on April 16, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/13/2015. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/20/2015 02:00 PM, in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Pretrial Order original only due by 4/16/2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/12/2015. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER on Motion for Reconsideration re: 40 Order, on January 8, 2015. It is therefore ORDERED, that upon reconsideration of the order, that ruling as to Kristin Heath is affirmed. This civil action is dismissed as to her as an individual defendant, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/27/2015. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
45
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/22/2015. Mr. Lane's Oral Motion to Reconsider Ms. Godfrey's Confession on the Declaratory Relief Section of this Case is granted. Denying 19 CDOC Defendants&# 039; Motion to Dismiss. Mr. Stocker and Ms. Lockwood shall file answers to the first amended complaint on or before 2/5/2015. Granting 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Individual Claims Against Defendant Kristin Heath. A written order is forthcoming. FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER This Court having now dismissed the third claim for relief against Intervention, Inc., and having also dismissed the individual claims against Susan Keller, Kristin Heath, and Rick Raemisch, and although the newly named defendant Jefferson County Board of Commissioners has not yet appeared in this civil action, a hearing now on the CDOC defendants motions to dismiss may facilitate this matter, it is ORDERED that after consultation with counsel a hearing will be set on the CDOC defendants motion to dismiss. Doc. 19 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/8/2015. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 36 plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand filed January 5, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/7/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FED.R.CIV. P. 7.1 BY DEFENDANT INTERVENTION COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SERVICES re 13 / 14 : on or before November 14, 2014, Defendant Intervention Community Corrections Services must file its Disclosure Statement or state why it is not subject to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/6/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, and when applicable to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/06/2014. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
