Sutton et al v. Roberts et al
| Isha Roberts and Joshua Sutton |
| Daniel Mariano, Peter Wiedmeyer, Marilyn Gifford, Atelle Jones, Gary Wyberg, Debra Tota, Debrah Romano, Bill Thiebout, Jeff Chostner and Mason Kate |
| 1:2014cv02586 |
| September 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Kit Carson |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot #16 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/11/14.(dkals, )
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Joshua Sutton. (dkals, ) |
| Filing 15 JUDGMENT pursuant to #14 Order of Dismissal by Clerk on 12/8/14. (dkals, ) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pampers on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/8/14. (dkals, )
|
| Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED. This case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher.All future pleadings should be designated as 14-cv-02586-GPG. (Text Only Entry) (kweck) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Joshua Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmarb, ) |
|
Filing 11
MINITE ORDER denying as moot #10 Motion To Join, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/29/14.(nmarb, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION To Join and Notice of New Address at D.R.D.C., by Plaintiff Joshua Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nmarb, ) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service by Mail by Clerk of Court of #8 Minute Order, #7 Order, to: Joshua Sutton, #96416, Denver Reception & Diagnostic Center (DRDC), P.O. Box 392004, 10900 Smith Road, Denver, CO 80239. Text Only Entry (nmarb, ) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/28/14. The Clerk of the Court is directed to note the Docket in this case with the new address plaintiff provided in his other two cases and resend to Plaintiff a copy of the Order to File an Amended Complaint, ECF No. 7. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this Minute Order to comply with the October 27, 2014 Order. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Plaintiff Sutton to File Amended Complaint and Dismissing Plaintiff Roberts by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/27/14. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/23/14 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to DOC_inmateaccounts@state.co.us.(nmarb, )
|
| Filing 5 Statement and Amendment In RESPONSE to #4 Order to Cure Deficiencies, by Plaintiff Joshua Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document, #4 Continuation of Main Document, #5 Continuation of Main Document, #6 Continuation of Main Document, #7 Envelope)(nmarb, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Plaintiffs To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/18/14. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Text Only Entry (sphil, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Joshua Sutton. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Isha Roberts, Joshua Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sphil, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
