Hillman v. City of Wheat Ridge et al
| Alexander Hillman |
| City of Wheat Ridge, Brian Wilkinson, David Piermattei and Daniel Brennan |
| 1:2014cv02788 |
| October 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/2/15. ORDERED: The Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice 72 is GRANTED. ORDERED: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.(kpreu)
|
|
Filing
69
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's proposed second amended complaint [66-1] is accepted. The City of Wheat Ridge will be added as a defendant. The Motion to Dismiss Individually Named Defendants With Prejudice 68 is granted. All claims asserted against defendants Brian Wilkinson and David Piermattei are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/14/15.(pabsec)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Order granting 53 Motion to Dismiss Party. ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all claims asserted against defendant City of Wheat Ridge are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 05/28/15.(jhawk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
