McGrew et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Thomas Day and Terri Lyn Day |
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. |
1:2015cv00085 |
January 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Raymond P. Moore |
Nina Y Wang |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 8/6/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The court directs the clerk's office to amend the caption of this case to reflect the Day's as the only Plaintiffs. The corrected caption shall be Day et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) 34 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y Wang on 2/12/15 re: Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference 15 . The Motion is GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference set for 3/20/2015 is vacated and reset to 4/9/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y Wang. (bsimm, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/16/15. Scheduling Conference set for 3/20/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (bsimm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.