Cox v. Wilson
Plaintiff: Cody William Cox
Defendant: Don Wilson
Case Number: 1:2015cv00128
Filed: January 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Presiding Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER denying 156 the Defendant's construed Motion for Reconsideration by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/01/2016. (cthom, )
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 126 Motion in Limine by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/17/2016. (cthom, )
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR RULE 35 EXAMINATION by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/20/2016. The Stipulated Motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 35Examination 81 is GRANTED. (bsimm, )
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/23/15. Defendant's Motion for Contempt 60 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Motion for Extension 61 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 4/22/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. A proposed Final Pretrial Order is due no later than seven days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, and in addition to being filed, must be submitted in Word format to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov.(bsimm, )
December 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/16/15. Defendant's Motion for Psychiatric Examination Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 35 56 is DENIED.(bsimm, )
July 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/9/15. (bsimm, )
July 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 7/1/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Motion for Order Compelling Production 20 is DENIED as MOOT in light of the parties' agreement. No later than 7/8/2015, the Parties will s ubmit a proposed Protective Order to facilitate the production of the personnel file. Motion to Extend Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleading 23 is GRANTED. The deadline for joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings is extended to 7/15/2015. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/28/15. Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (bsimm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cody William Cox
Represented By: David Brill Law
Represented By: James F. Scherer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Wilson
Represented By: Leslie Lynn Schluter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?