Hurt v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
| Steven F. Hurt |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2015cv00508 |
| March 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to 64 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Steven F. Hurt and by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/29/2015. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
49
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 8/20/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate the pending motion associated with the Administrative Record 46 . Motion Requesting Discovery 35 is G RANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant shall propound responses on or before 9/21/2015. Defendants objections to the discovery will be identified in the responses. Parties will contact chambers to set up an informal discovery conference for the week of 9/21/2015, if necessary. Proposed Protective Order due 9/21/2015. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/03/15 granting 22 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall file with the court a Notice of Amended Computation of Damages on or before June 10, 2015.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
19
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 5/4/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to the filing of the Stipulation for Partial Dismissal With Prejudice 17 , the Partial Motion to Dismiss 13 is WITHDRAWN without prejudice. Parties discuss status of settlement efforts. Parties shall advise the court if settlement/early neutral evaluation may be helpful, through a joint status report to be filed on or before 7/24/2015. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/13/15. Scheduling Conference set for 5/4/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order, through ECF, and including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hurt v. Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven F. Hurt | |
| Represented By: | Bruce Jeffrey Kaye |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Franz Hardy |
| Represented By: | Christine Marie Kroupa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
