Heat On-The Fly, LLC v. Enservco Corporation et al
| Heat On-The Fly, LLC |
| Enservco Corporation and Heat Waves Hot Oil Service, LLC |
| Heat Waves Hot Oil Service, LLC |
| Heat On-The Fly, LLC |
| 1:2015cv00983 |
| May 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: In light of the decline of consent to a magistrate judge by one or more of the parties in this case and its reassignment to this Court, the Scheduling Conference set July 13, 2015 before Magistrate Judge Wang is VACATED. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date within 14 days of the date of this order. Please see the order for details. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 6/17/2015. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/03/15, Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Pilot Program Consent. Consent Form due by 7/6/2015. Scheduling Conference set for 7/13/2015 03:00 PM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
