In Re Radha Ramana Murty Narumanchi et al
Appellee: Wafeek Abdelsayed
Appellant: Radha Ramana Murty Narumanchi
Case Number: 3:2011cv01127
Filed: July 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Alvin W. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RULING affirming decision of Bankruptcy Court. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 03/28/2012. (Giering, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Radha Ramana Murty Narumanchi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Wafeek Abdelsayed
Represented By: William S. Fish, Jr.
Represented By: Brian M. Gildea
Represented By: Amy E. Markim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Radha Ramana Murty Narumanchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?