Klorczyk et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
| Frederick Klorczyk, Jr. and Lynne Klorczyk |
| Sears, Roebuck & Co., Shinn Fu Corporation and Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc. |
| MVP (HK) Industries, LTD |
| Sears, Roebuck & Co. |
| 3:2013cv00257 |
| February 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Robert N. Chatigny |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
329
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PRECLUDE AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the accompanying ruling, defendants' motion to preclude the testimony of Frederick Heath (Doc. # 295 ) is DENIED. D efendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' product liability claims in their entirety (Doc. # 296 ) is DENIED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the jack stand's stream of commerce (Doc. # 297 ) is GRANTED I N PART as to defendant Shinn Fu Corporation (SFC) and DENIED IN PART as to defendant Shinn Fu Company of America (SFA). Defendants' motion for summary judgment on punitive damages (Doc. # 298 ) is DENIED. This action remains STAYED as to defenda nt Sears. In accordance with the Court's scheduling order (Doc. #288), plaintiffs and non-Sears defendants shall file their joint trial memorandum on or before April 29, 2019. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/29/2019. (Rubin, N.)
|
|
Filing
270
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF ROGER CLAYPOOL. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendants' motion to preclude the testimony of Roger Claypool (Doc. # 228 ) is DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/1/2017. (Levenson, C.)
|
|
Filing
172
RULING re 145 Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendants' Discovery Requests or, in the Alternative, Motion for Leave for an Extension of Time regarding Plaintiffs' Responses. The Court GRANTS in part plaintiffs' motion for an extension of time regarding their responses. See attached ruling for details. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 4/9/2015.(Katz, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
