Julian Development, LLC v. Old Village Mill, LLC et al
| Julian Development, LLC |
| Old Village Mill, LLC |
| Old Village Mill, LLC |
| Julian Development, LLC |
| George J. Scarveles and Connecticut Building Solutions, LLC |
| 3:2013cv01510 |
| October 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Michael P. Shea |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, OVM's 28 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Julian's 4 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy and 22 Motion for Temporary Injunction are DENIED. OVM's 52 Motion to Compel and 67 Motion in L imine are DENIED as moot. OVM's 54 Motion for Contempt is DENIED. OVM's 80 Motion to Vacate is DENIED as moot. The Court's Order granting OVM's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is STAYED pending the determination of t he amount of bond that OVM must post in order to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(c). Both Julian and OVM shall submit briefs within 14 days from the entry of this Order detailing a proposal for the amount of the bond that is appropriate to protect Julian's interests. The parties shall submit, within 21 days from the entry of this Order, a Rule 26(f) Report complying with the Local Rules of this Court. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/11/2014. (Pomeroy, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
