553 Broad Street, LLC v. Meriden
Plaintiff: 553 Broad Street, LLC
Defendant: City of Meriden
Case Number: 3:2014cv00896
Filed: June 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Remand to State Court and denying plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/30/2015. (Shin, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 553 Broad Street, LLC v. Meriden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 553 Broad Street, LLC
Represented By: Kyle R. Pavlick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Meriden
Represented By: Emily E Cosentino
Represented By: Alan Raymond Dembiczak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?