TicketNetwork, Inc. v. Darbouze
Plaintiff: TicketNetwork, Inc.
Defendant: Yves Darbouze
Case Number: 3:2015cv00237
Filed: February 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Victor A. Bolden
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting 17 Motion To Cite in Additional Party Defendant; granting 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/22/2015. (Dearing, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TicketNetwork, Inc. v. Darbouze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yves Darbouze
Represented By: Neyah K. Bennett
Represented By: David D. Lin
Represented By: Justin Mercer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TicketNetwork, Inc.
Represented By: Edward J. Heath
Represented By: Jennifer LaPorte
Represented By: Brian J. Wheelin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?