Crespo v. Warden
Petitioner: Rafael J. Crespo
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2015cv00640
Filed: April 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Windham
Presiding Judge: Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER denying 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the respondent and close the case. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/30/2018. (Jamieson, K)
May 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying without prejudice 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 7 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/9/2016. (Pollack, R.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crespo v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rafael J. Crespo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?