Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Davis v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:Charles William Davis, Jr
Defendant:Social Security Administration
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00158
Filed:September 11, 2009
 
Court:Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:Jonesboro Office [ Court Info ]
County:Poinsett
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes
Presiding Judge:Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones Jr.
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones Jr.
 
Nature of Suit:Social Security - Disability Insurance
Cause:42:402 Social Security Benefits
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Davis v. Social Security Administration
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles William Davis, Jr
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.