Dodson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
| Plaintiff: | Randall E. Dodson |
|---|
| Defendant: | Social Security Administration Commissioner |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 3:2007cv03051 |
|---|
| Filed: | October 17, 2007 |
|---|
| |
| Court: | Arkansas Western District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Harrison Office [ Court Info ] |
|---|
| County: | Boone |
|---|
| Presiding Judge: | Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren |
|---|
| Referring Judge: | Honorable James R. Marschewski |
|---|
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Social Security - Disability Insurance |
|---|
| Cause: | 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
|---|
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. Government Defendant |
|---|
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
|---|
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| October 17, 2007 | 3 |  ***DISREGARD WRONG PDF ATTACHED***ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing clerk to file complaint nunc pro tunc as of October 11, 2007. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and this order o n the defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from date of service. Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on October 15, 2007. (tg) Modified on 10/17/2007 (tg). |
| October 17, 2007 | 4 | ORDER granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing clerk to file complaint nunc pro tunc as of October 11, 2007, filed by Randall E. Dodson. Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on October 15, 2007. (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.